|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 7:41:38 GMT -6
I'm not talking about the legal fees anymore. It's like some of you are choosing not to read about what is being said. It's not about the legal fees. Fuck them fees. It's the portrayal that she's suing for $1. Yes maybe for punitive damages but that's not all. Now today your deer in headlights that people do shit for tactics or PR. Oh OK. 🙄😂 Let someone being suing your ass and punitively $1 and you would suddenly have a great understanding. This is literally all I was saying. It’s fine she wants to be made full but all anyone is talking about is the $1
|
|
Cher
Global Moderator
BMB, GD, Special Interests
Posts: 57,484 Likes: 442,274
|
Post by Cher on Mar 29, 2023 7:45:25 GMT -6
Also, GP never said it was a SA. She said she was trying to figure out what the guy was doing, whether it was a prank or something perverted. Sanderson’s atty called it a SA and GP clarified that it was a fleeting thought. GP said the way he crashed into her was really weird, he slowly pressed himself up against her, grunting. I’ve been skiied into and I’ve skiied into people, it happens. I’ve been “crashed into” where someone has no control and comes barreling into you or someone has some control and tries to stop and might give you a heads up. If it happened like she said, yeah, fuck that guy. It’s fucking weird. But I didn’t think she said it to make you think it was a SA. She was laying the groundwork why she yelled at the guy and cursed at him. I guess for me this clearly spells a tactic to say you had a fleeting thought something perverted was being done when you now have the benefit of hindsight and it was broad daylight and all these people around. Her kids are alleged witnesses. Yet you give credibility to it? When you know it can be a tactic in court? It just surprises me coming from you I guess. Because look at the convo we’ve had on the board, “why didn’t she stay?” “She was a bitch”. Her atty knew that would be the takeaway, so they laid the groundwork why she reacted the way she did. If you watch the testimony, if it happened the way she described, the takeaway isn’t she got SA, it’s yeah, I’d be mad and not want to hang out with this guy either.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,183 Likes: 296,687
|
Post by McBenny on Mar 29, 2023 7:46:03 GMT -6
For me it's not even do I like her or like him.
I have a hard time picturing him crashing into her from behind as she stated and her screaming before the hit and he having injuries to one side of his body.
I have a hard time believing she felt they collided and that it was no biggie so she left when he had 4 broken ribs.
I feel that she was whisked away due to her celebrity and probably was told dont worry about it and no one knew the extent of his injuries at that time since it appears he was yelled at by 2 people. No one called slope medics for him.
For me it's the physics, could he have crashed into her from behind like she said and only have injuries to one side? I need a CSI reenactment.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,183 Likes: 296,687
|
Post by McBenny on Mar 29, 2023 7:47:46 GMT -6
I guess for me this clearly spells a tactic to say you had a fleeting thought something perverted was being done when you now have the benefit of hindsight and it was broad daylight and all these people around. Her kids are alleged witnesses. Yet you give credibility to it? When you know it can be a tactic in court? It just surprises me coming from you I guess. Because look at the convo we’ve had on the board, “why didn’t she stay?” “She was a bitch”. Her atty knew that would be the takeaway, so they laid the groundwork why she reacted the way she did. If you watch the testimony, if it happened the way she described, the takeaway isn’t she got SA, it’s yeah, I’d be mad and not want to hang out with this guy either. OK but your statements don't read like you see it as legal groundwork which is where I am. So I guess that's why you confuse me. The fuck him if so remarks I guess. 🤷🏻♀️
|
|
brux
Diamond
Posts: 35,325 Likes: 282,429
|
Post by brux on Mar 29, 2023 7:52:20 GMT -6
McBenny I saw a jokey tiktok video a couple days ago, but it made the "him crashing from behind" scenario look possible. And then he crumpled onto his side and she fell on top of him, so it would explain his injuries on his side. Let me see if I can find it.
|
|
elle
Ruby
Posts: 17,693 Likes: 113,360
|
Post by elle on Mar 29, 2023 7:54:09 GMT -6
McBenny I saw a jokey tiktok video a couple days ago, but it made the "him crashing from behind" scenario look possible. And then he crumpled onto his side and she fell on top of him, so it would explain his injuries on his side. Let me see if I can find it. He was also 69 at the time right? Which could also explain how he'd end up with broken ribs while she had no such injuries herself.
|
|
Cher
Global Moderator
BMB, GD, Special Interests
Posts: 57,484 Likes: 442,274
|
Post by Cher on Mar 29, 2023 7:54:24 GMT -6
Because look at the convo we’ve had on the board, “why didn’t she stay?” “She was a bitch”. Her atty knew that would be the takeaway, so they laid the groundwork why she reacted the way she did. If you watch the testimony, if it happened the way she described, the takeaway isn’t she got SA, it’s yeah, I’d be mad and not want to hang out with this guy either. OK but your statements don't read like you see it as legal groundwork which is where I am. So I guess that's why you confuse me. The fuck him if so remarks I guess. 🤷🏻♀️ Bc that is a weird way to crash into someone on a ski slope and I’d be mad too.
|
|
brux
Diamond
Posts: 35,325 Likes: 282,429
|
Post by brux on Mar 29, 2023 7:57:52 GMT -6
|
|
brux
Diamond
Posts: 35,325 Likes: 282,429
|
Post by brux on Mar 29, 2023 7:58:50 GMT -6
McBenny I saw a jokey tiktok video a couple days ago, but it made the "him crashing from behind" scenario look possible. And then he crumpled onto his side and she fell on top of him, so it would explain his injuries on his side. Let me see if I can find it. He was also 69 at the time right? Which could also explain how he'd end up with broken ribs while she had no such injuries herself. That was kind of my operating assumption all along.
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 7:59:26 GMT -6
OK but your statements don't read like you see it as legal groundwork which is where I am. So I guess that's why you confuse me. The fuck him if so remarks I guess. 🤷🏻♀️ Bc that is a weird way to crash into someone on a ski slope and I’d be mad too. From behind? I thought those who ski said it happens a lot? I truly don’t ski and only went 1 time in 8th grade an no I will not say how long ago that is.
|
|
|
Post by SweetPotato on Mar 29, 2023 8:14:36 GMT -6
I'm not talking about the legal fees anymore. It's like some of you are choosing not to read about what is being said. It's not about the legal fees. Fuck them fees. It's the portrayal that she's suing for $1. Yes maybe for punitive damages but that's not all. Now today your deer in headlights that people do shit for tactics or PR. Oh OK. 🙄😂 Let someone being suing your ass and punitively $1 and you would suddenly have a great understanding. This is literally all I was saying. It’s fine she wants to be made full but all anyone is talking about is the $1 Because those are the damages she is seeking. He is seeking the 300k and I promise is also asking for attorneys fees as well. Nobody had to like it, but they really are two different things legally.
|
|
bloom
Gold
Posts: 985 Likes: 2,378
|
Post by bloom on Mar 29, 2023 8:21:09 GMT -6
For me it's not even do I like her or like him. I have a hard time picturing him crashing into her from behind as she stated and her screaming before the hit and he having injuries to one side of his body. I have a hard time believing she felt they collided and that it was no biggie so she left when he had 4 broken ribs. I feel that she was whisked away due to her celebrity and probably was told dont worry about it and no one knew the extent of his injuries at that time since it appears he was yelled at by 2 people. No one called slope medics for him. For me it's the physics, could he have crashed into her from behind like she said and only have injuries to one side? I need a CSI reenactment. TS claimed he was yelled at by her kids ski instructor; the instructor denies that. GP left shortly after b/c the instructor took the lead to make sure TS was okay and yes, I'm sure that has a bunch to do w/ her being a celebrity. but can we all agree that we live in a world where celebs get perks? doesn't make it right, but it's not what she's on trial for. the ski patrol was there w/in ~15 minutes after it was reported. he fell on his side and she fell on top of him. that's when they're concluding he broke his ribs, not during the collision. he said he was okay.
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:23:19 GMT -6
This is literally all I was saying. It’s fine she wants to be made full but all anyone is talking about is the $1 Because those are the damages she is seeking. He is seeking the 300k and I promise is also asking for attorneys fees as well. Nobody had to like it, but they really are two different things legally. Again I don’t have a problem with that but the MEDIA is making it all about the $1 which I feel is good PR It’s fine others don’t it isn’t that serious All I’ve heard is about how great of a person she is because she is only doing a $1 and what a great person she is and how terrible he is because he is just trying to get money.
|
|
bloom
Gold
Posts: 985 Likes: 2,378
|
Post by bloom on Mar 29, 2023 8:28:27 GMT -6
Because those are the damages she is seeking. He is seeking the 300k and I promise is also asking for attorneys fees as well. Nobody had to like it, but they really are two different things legally. Again I don’t have a problem with that but the MEDIA is making it all about the $1 which I feel is good PR It’s fine others don’t it isn’t that serious All I’ve heard is about how great of a person she is because she is only doing a $1 and what a great person she is and how terrible he is because he is just trying to get money. I think in her case, she's damned if she does, damned if she doesn't. If she was asking for 100k+, would that be just as bad/worse/better? I don't think he's about the money at all. I think he's got character flaws lol and wants to be in the limelight to an extent.
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:31:14 GMT -6
Again I don’t have a problem with that but the MEDIA is making it all about the $1 which I feel is good PR It’s fine others don’t it isn’t that serious All I’ve heard is about how great of a person she is because she is only doing a $1 and what a great person she is and how terrible he is because he is just trying to get money. Well first you put it on GP because she wants to look good, then put it on the lawyer as if it was a ploy. Now you’ve moved it to being the media. Which they don’t have any influence over. If it’s this big secret that no one knows about and everyone only thinks it’s $1 how did you find out she is asking for legal fee covering afterwards? How does everyone in this thread understand that it’s a thing. Cool
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:34:59 GMT -6
I’m not falling into this with you so you can count my posts or made it a thing but I’m not getting into it with you so you can talk all about how I’m mean and constantly coming at you so I’m doing what I’ve been doing and not going to argue with you
|
|
Cher
Global Moderator
BMB, GD, Special Interests
Posts: 57,484 Likes: 442,274
|
Post by Cher on Mar 29, 2023 8:35:35 GMT -6
Bc that is a weird way to crash into someone on a ski slope and I’d be mad too. From behind? I thought those who ski said it happens a lot? I truly don’t ski and only went 1 time in 8th grade an no I will not say how long ago that is. Upthread I said it happened and said how’s it happened in my cases. I’ve never had someone crash into me the way she described, that’s weird.
|
|
|
Post by SweetPotato on Mar 29, 2023 8:41:45 GMT -6
Bc that is a weird way to crash into someone on a ski slope and I’d be mad too. From behind? I thought those who ski said it happens a lot? I truly don’t ski and only went 1 time in 8th grade an no I will not say how long ago that is. Skiing is an inherently dangerous activity, but it’s not like people are just smashing into each other all over the mountain. Of course it happens, but someone skiing into me from behind would freak me out for sure. Also that’s how I ski with my son on catwalks, etc so I can definitely see how her version of events could be possible.
|
|
Cher
Global Moderator
BMB, GD, Special Interests
Posts: 57,484 Likes: 442,274
|
Post by Cher on Mar 29, 2023 8:47:25 GMT -6
I read an interview with a ski instructor who said it was very unlikely for Sanderson’s ski tips to fly up in the air and land on his face (as testified) if GP hit him from behind. It’s like the perm in Legally Blonde for outdoorsy people.
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:47:37 GMT -6
I’m not falling into this with you so you can count my posts or made it a thing but I’m not getting into it with you so you can talk all about how I’m mean and constantly coming at you so I’m doing what I’ve been doing and not going to argue with you Okay! To me we’re just discussing a thing. One which has several people in the thread that see different sides to the said thing. This isn’t anything about meanness or arguing for the sake of it (especially given there’s others who have similar views as each of us). I do not think this is anyone coming at anyone. You can post however you want to whoever you want, but you are responding with your points to others and disregarding my points by posting petty responses like ‘ok’ and ‘cool’. Which again, is your right to do so. I’m just pointing out that makes you look petty, when you could simply just not respond at all. Because I have a good posting history with the others and I don’t with you. I love how I said I’m not going to do it with you and you still found a way to call me something
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:49:30 GMT -6
I read an interview with a ski instructor who said it was very unlikely for Sanderson’s ski tips to fly up in the air and land on his face (as testified) if GP hit him from behind. It’s like the perm in Legally Blonde for outdoorsy people. And ive seen the opposite 😂😂 I feel I need to go ski for science
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 8:50:40 GMT -6
But we all know I’m lazy and cold adverse despite living in Ohio so it won’t
|
|
Cher
Global Moderator
BMB, GD, Special Interests
Posts: 57,484 Likes: 442,274
|
Post by Cher on Mar 29, 2023 8:51:52 GMT -6
I read an interview with a ski instructor who said it was very unlikely for Sanderson’s ski tips to fly up in the air and land on his face (as testified) if GP hit him from behind. It’s like the perm in Legally Blonde for outdoorsy people. And ive seen the opposite 😂😂 I feel I need to go ski for science www.curbed.com/2023/03/gwenyth-paltrow-trial-ski-instructor-code.html
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 9:03:49 GMT -6
And there it is exactly why the fuck I should have stuck to just my petty one liners
|
|
|
Post by oreobitsy on Mar 29, 2023 9:13:50 GMT -6
The whispered “I’m sorry” from TS got my eyes rolling. He’s a character.
|
|
|
Post by icedcoffee on Mar 29, 2023 10:28:47 GMT -6
So do you guys think his witness is lying for him? Or do you think he genuinely thinks that's how it went down? I have a hard time with thinking someone would commit perjury for such a small claim case that he wouldn't even get anything out of. So that's making me pause a little bit
I keep going back and forth on who is telling the truth but I am leaning more towards him for whatever reason. Which is why I said I'm glad I'm not on the jury 🤣
|
|
|
Post by angelashly on Mar 29, 2023 10:42:29 GMT -6
So do you guys think his witness is lying for him? Or do you think he genuinely thinks that's how it went down? I have a hard time with thinking someone would commit perjury for such a small claim case that he wouldn't even get anything out of. So that's making me pause a little bit I keep going back and forth on who is telling the truth but I am leaning more towards him for whatever reason. Which is why I said I'm glad I'm not on the jury 🤣 And her witnesses are her kids who I don’t think would perjure themselves either. They have heard her say over and over her account so I’m not surprised they are similar to hers. Same as his witnesses. It’s why they should just go separately and no one win anything. It’s been 7 years how can people remember exactly what happened that day
|
|
brux
Diamond
Posts: 35,325 Likes: 282,429
|
Post by brux on Mar 29, 2023 10:44:06 GMT -6
My hunch about TS's witness is that he truly believes his version of the story after all these years.
Witness memories are notoriously flawed and subject to influences and unconscious revision.
I think the friend thinks he saw 100% of what happened, when he probably actually didn't. Because who is spending their time on a ski slope starting directly at someone else 100% of the time? I think he saw some or saw the aftermath, and now coupled with his friend's injuries and ongoing trial, he believes that he saw what he thinks he saw.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,183 Likes: 296,687
|
Post by McBenny on Mar 29, 2023 10:59:21 GMT -6
This right here what you are saying adds nothing to the conversation that's being had here. It comes off trolling because it is literally repeating the same shit you said but in a different way. Let me be clear for you: No one said she cannot sue for her legal costs. No one said that. No one is confused about who sued who first. Ok I’m saying the same shit I said in a different way in response to you and others saying the same shit in a different way though? Your grievance is that the lawyer said $1 when there will be more given AFTER, SEPARATELY, AND ONLY IF SHE WINS. Why is the Laywer obliged to say that? I’m asking why you think that needs to be brought up in court and if it regularly is in any other court. The proceedings are happening how they should as far as I am aware. I do not have a grievance about it. I said it was a legal tactic. That's my opinion. Then I commented on the people who felt they needed to post that it was within her right to sue for her legal fees because not I or anyone else said she could not or that it was not in within her rights. I commented that it was a tactic in my opinion since emphasized by her attorney and I even cited the sentiment posted here on this forum by someone who said well since she is suing for $1 they gave her more credibility. Hence it made my point about a regular layperson who would be on a jury. I am not discussing this further with you because I feel at this point and this is my 2nd time saying this that you are TROLLING me. Those are my feelings and my perception and discussing this with no serves me nothing since at this point I no longer value your feedback on the matter as I would someone else in the thread.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,183 Likes: 296,687
|
Post by McBenny on Mar 29, 2023 11:01:59 GMT -6
Bc that is a weird way to crash into someone on a ski slope and I’d be mad too. From behind? I thought those who ski said it happens a lot? I truly don’t ski and only went 1 time in 8th grade an no I will not say how long ago that is. I saw those that ski say the same. In this thread even.
|
|