STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:18:29 GMT -6
Apparently itโs only if you include the other persons comments, which she did ๐คทโโ๏ธ But without that- then we have the narrative of a nasty PM. Letโs be real here. You a long time loved poster bs barely tolerated Philo- she has to come with receipts. Otherwise sheโs then added to the troll who sends nasty PM list I told her not to PM me at all. Her choice to do so again. That also wasnโt the whole thing.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:20:12 GMT -6
Also lol that Iโm a long time loved poster.
News to me.
|
|
๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐
Emerald
I never gossip, I observe...And then relay my observations to practically everyone.โ
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 125,967
|
Post by ๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐ on Jul 26, 2023 17:21:58 GMT -6
I find several oddities here. And Iโm no fan of Philo. But this is wild and weird even by our middle of the summer, post COVID lull.
While I don't have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the forum, it's important to consider the evidence presented. If the accused poster has proven that they didn't send nasty messages through PM, I believe banning should be based on evidence and not just adherence to the forum's guidelines. The admins should carefully evaluate the situation and make a fair decision. And I donโt think banning Philo was fair in this case.
My unsolicited recommendation
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:22:33 GMT -6
I find several oddities here. And Iโm no fan of Philo. But this is wild and weird even by our middle of the summer, post COVID lull. While I don't have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the forum, it's important to consider the evidence presented. If the accused poster has proven that they didn't send nasty messages through PM, I believe banning should be based on evidence and not just adherence to the forum's guidelines. The admins should carefully evaluate the situation and make a fair decision. And I donโt think banning Philo was fair in this case. My unsolicited recommendation She literally posted my PM respond to her. My words. Not hers. Thatโs the violation. Not the second one. Youโre either ignoring that or conflating it. She wasnโt banned for posting the screenshot of her PM.
|
|
Eagles
Opal
Posts: 8,868 Likes: 46,267
|
Post by Eagles on Jul 26, 2023 17:22:36 GMT -6
Me and you both. So many times I was called mean and whatever else because of her Eagles warned us from the very beginning Well I've been offline most of the day for work so I now I need to catch up.
|
|
๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐
Emerald
I never gossip, I observe...And then relay my observations to practically everyone.โ
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 125,967
|
Post by ๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐ on Jul 26, 2023 17:23:41 GMT -6
But without that- then we have the narrative of a nasty PM. Letโs be real here. You a long time loved poster bs barely tolerated Philo- she has to come with receipts. Otherwise sheโs then added to the troll who sends nasty PM list I told her not to PM me at all. Her choice to do so again. That also wasnโt the whole thing. But there was no nasty PM. A PM by itself is not nasty. We both also know that had you truly not wanted any contact with Philo you couldโve blocked her from PMing you. Itโs ok to say โI donโt like that bitchโ but throwing out โnasty PMโ would get the exact reaction that it got.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:25:06 GMT -6
I told her not to PM me at all. Her choice to do so again. That also wasnโt the whole thing. But there was no nasty PM. A PM by itself is not nasty. We both also know that had you truly not wanted any contact with Philo you couldโve blocked her from PMing you. Itโs ok to say โI donโt like that bitchโ but throwing out โnasty PMโ would get the exact reaction that it got. I have no idea what axe you think you're grinding here. And I already said I unblocked her last week bc the blocks were annoying to read and we hadn't really interacted. She waited all of six days. Still not bannable, and not what she was banned for. She was banned for posting my PM response, which is in violation of TOU. That was before this conversation about her previous PM, which she then posted part of her side of. The nastiness - believed or not - had nothing to do with anything other than the longer conversation.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:25:23 GMT -6
Me too. That man said we have bodies and ships. ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ I havenโt slept after watching some of this stuff. These beings seem hostile from what Iโm hearing. Which ๐ณ Yes some were but if we shooting them down then I could see it. He said the US Govt been knowing since 1930s.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:27:16 GMT -6
The word nasty was not uttered before she violated TOU. She did that before I shockingly accused her of being nasty.
Which she was.
And not why she was banned.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:27:54 GMT -6
Iโm also confused as to why PMs that donโt give a name, umber ,address or finding someone IRL is bannable? Like if I post a PM that I sent you- that being bannable is wild I did ask Admin to clarify TOU by writing it out. What's bannable? Any part of pm Posting other people's part Posting your part If you said today, it's other people part then please write that out in TOU. Thanks
|
|
๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐
Emerald
I never gossip, I observe...And then relay my observations to practically everyone.โ
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 125,967
|
Post by ๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐ on Jul 26, 2023 17:28:09 GMT -6
But there was no nasty PM. A PM by itself is not nasty. We both also know that had you truly not wanted any contact with Philo you couldโve blocked her from PMing you. Itโs ok to say โI donโt like that bitchโ but throwing out โnasty PMโ would get the exact reaction that it got. I have no idea what axe you think you're grinding here. And I already said I unblocked her last week bc the blocks were annoying to read and we hadn't really interacted. She waited all of six days. Still not bannable, and not what she was banned for.ย She was banned for posting my PM response, which is in violation of TOU. That was before this conversation about her previous PM, which she then posted part of her side of.ย The nastiness - believed or not - had nothing to do with anything other than the longer conversation.ย Scout you and I and Jesus know you donโt like Philo. Sheโs second only to Moonhue/socks/olive for you. Coming out saying sheโs sending you nasty PM wouldโve done nothing more than rile people up. Youโve never been shy. Why post a warning shot? Because if the bitch that I donโt fuck with sent me even a nasty after thought - I wouldโve been coming out blazing. Thereโd be no warning.
|
|
๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐
Emerald
I never gossip, I observe...And then relay my observations to practically everyone.โ
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 125,967
|
Post by ๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐ on Jul 26, 2023 17:29:06 GMT -6
Iโm also confused as to why PMs that donโt give a name, umber ,address or finding someone IRL is bannable? Like if I post a PM that I sent you- that being bannable is wild I did ask Admin to clarify TOU by writing it out. What's bannable? Any part of pm Posting other people's part Posting your part If you said today, it's other people part then please write that out in TOU. Thanks But thereโs other parts of the TOu that get ignored depending on poster. So it has to be across the board.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:29:11 GMT -6
I have no idea what axe you think you're grinding here. And I already said I unblocked her last week bc the blocks were annoying to read and we hadn't really interacted. She waited all of six days. Still not bannable, and not what she was banned for. She was banned for posting my PM response, which is in violation of TOU. That was before this conversation about her previous PM, which she then posted part of her side of. The nastiness - believed or not - had nothing to do with anything other than the longer conversation. Scout you and I and Jesus know you donโt like Philo. Sheโs second only to Moonhue/socks/olive for you. Coming out saying sheโs sending you nasty PM wouldโve done nothing more than rile people up. Youโve never been shy. Why post a warning shot? Because if the bitch that I donโt fuck with sent me even a nasty after thought - I wouldโve been coming out blazing. Thereโd be no warning. Because posting PMs is in violation of TOU. And I didn't feel like having this exact conversation at the time. Where I would not be believed, my feelings would be dismissed, and I'd be told I'm some exaggerating liar. Instincts were dead on. I despise Phil and have made no secret of it, including in this thread where I've owned up to my part in things.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:29:26 GMT -6
philo I told you before that if you send me any more nasty PMs, I will just bring them to the board. You said nasty on page 1, post 1. ๐ค
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:30:39 GMT -6
philo I told you before that if you send me any more nasty PMs, I will just bring them to the board. You said nasty on page 1, post 1. ๐ค Mea culpa. She still violated TOU. And for someone who was screaming that she needed a "virtual restraining order," it's interesting that you constantly engage with me when I haven't said boo to you in quite some time.
|
|
๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐
Emerald
I never gossip, I observe...And then relay my observations to practically everyone.โ
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 125,967
|
Post by ๐ ๐ Fineapple ๐ ๐ on Jul 26, 2023 17:34:31 GMT -6
You said nasty on page 1, post 1. ๐ค Mea culpa. She still violated TOU. And for someone who was screaming that she needed a "virtual restraining order," it's interesting that you constantly engage with me when I haven't said boo to you in quite some time.ย She violated the TOU because you lied. So itโs a chicken before the egg thing? Is the lie the chicken? Or the TOU the egg?
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:36:22 GMT -6
Mea culpa. She still violated TOU. And for someone who was screaming that she needed a "virtual restraining order," it's interesting that you constantly engage with me when I haven't said boo to you in quite some time. She violated the TOU because you lied. So itโs a chicken before the egg thing? Is the lie the chicken? Or the TOU the egg? Oh I did huh? Lied. Huh. Where?
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:38:08 GMT -6
You said nasty on page 1, post 1. ๐ค Mea culpa. She still violated TOU. And for someone who was screaming that she needed a "virtual restraining order," it's interesting that you constantly engage with me when I haven't said boo to you in quite some time.ย Do you want to do this? I have documentation of your consistent pokes at me. I have screenshots, witness statements, I'm ready. ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ Secondly, if I'm speaking on you, your post, etc then I will quote it. If you don't like it, block me. I'm not like you steady making digs and digs about you buried in the thread. I will say it to you and lay the shit at your feet. I am comfortable in my skin and who I am as a person. I know you don't know that life. Not my problem. I'm fine being the villain in your story. As you're the clown in mine. ๐คก
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:41:11 GMT -6
You also said nasty pm in the blinds thread. 6 hours ago. I mean it's cool. It's done. I don't care about Phil either way. It just looks like an untruth was said here.
|
|
rvasc
Emerald
Posts: 14,421 Likes: 83,501
|
Post by rvasc on Jul 26, 2023 17:42:00 GMT -6
Iโm reading this after the fact and am very, very confused, but this is an underrated post. Hilarious, AmyG! And no likes, hours later?!
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:42:06 GMT -6
.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:42:27 GMT -6
You also said nasty pm in the blinds thread. 6 hours ago. I mean it's cool. It's done. I don't care about Phil either way. It just looks like an untruth was said here. No shit, I cut and pasted it. you didn't tag me in any of your digs in this thread alone. I'm glad you like yourself, but there are some untruths to go around.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:42:37 GMT -6
.
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:43:56 GMT -6
You also said nasty pm in the blinds thread. 6 hours ago. I mean it's cool. It's done. I don't care about Phil either way. It just looks like an untruth was said here. No shit, I cut and pasted it. you didn't tag me in any of your digs in this thread alone. I'm glad you like yourself, but there are some untruths to go around. I didn't have to tag you. You were the topic. Like hello? Most of this thread was about you and Phil. My posts, your posts, all the ladies had something to say about the topic at hand but whatever.
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 17:44:31 GMT -6
KTSE of course
|
|
McBenny
Unicorn
#sickomode
Posts: 52,412 Likes: 297,405
|
Post by McBenny on Jul 26, 2023 17:47:46 GMT -6
What if it wasn't Kristen but Dax?
Plot twist ๐๐ณ
|
|
AmyG
Ruby
Posts: 15,709 Likes: 34,569
|
Post by AmyG on Jul 26, 2023 18:05:35 GMT -6
I guess Iโm confused. Why is it bannable to post a PM that you sent? It was a very un important pm. Barely registered. So why did this pm deserve this much attention and end up with a banning? Because it's wednesday?
|
|
STP
Diamond
Posts: 43,598 Likes: 316,410
|
Post by STP on Jul 26, 2023 18:06:56 GMT -6
I guess Iโm confused. Why is it bannable to post a PM that you sent? It was a very un important pm. Barely registered. So why did this pm deserve this much attention and end up with a banning? Because it's wednesday? Because I told her I would last time. If you all need deeper meaning, I can't help you. Ask her why she felt the need to PM that this Wednesday. She'll be back tomorrow, I'm sure.
|
|
rvasc
Emerald
Posts: 14,421 Likes: 83,501
|
Post by rvasc on Jul 26, 2023 18:06:57 GMT -6
I read all 11 pages of this thread.
I do not think the TOU need to be clarified in regards to posting another personโs pm. You canโt do it. The end. Not if they goad you, taunt you, lie on you, whatever.
|
|
jaygee
Diamond
Posts: 28,922 Likes: 226,124
|
Post by jaygee on Jul 26, 2023 18:07:58 GMT -6
Iโm also confused as to why PMs that donโt give a name, umber ,address or finding someone IRL is bannable? Like if I post a PM that I sent you- that being bannable is wild ๐ฏ Maybe at least make it a 3 strikes rule or something rather than immediate ban if there's no personal info You should probably lobby for more than 3 strikes. You know, to keep your options open.
|
|