|
Post by ArielMermaid on May 1, 2019 7:13:51 GMT -6
me: WHERE IS THAT BABY? Meghan: UPDATE- IT’S A BOYPublished 6 May 2019 Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex was safely delivered of a son at 0526hrs this morning. The baby weighs 7lbs 3oz. The Duke of Sussex was present for the birth. The Queen, The Duke of Edinburgh, The Prince of Wales, The Duchess of Cornwall, The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Lady Jane Fellowes, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Earl Spencer have been informed and are delighted with the news. The Duchess’s mother, Doria Ragland, who is overjoyed by the arrival of her first grandchild, is with Their Royal Highnesses at Frogmore Cottage. Her Royal Highness and the baby are both doing well. Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor
|
|
angelashly
Unicorn
Posts: 70,144 Likes: 279,588
Member is Online
|
Post by angelashly on May 1, 2019 7:15:50 GMT -6
|
|
Taitai
Opal
Posts: 8,305 Likes: 54,853
|
Post by Taitai on May 1, 2019 7:22:12 GMT -6
|
|
chrisy01
Emerald
Posts: 10,905 Likes: 51,640
|
Post by chrisy01 on May 1, 2019 7:30:35 GMT -6
|
|
cakewench
Emerald
Posts: 12,446 Likes: 86,505
Member is Online
|
Post by cakewench on May 1, 2019 7:32:47 GMT -6
|
|
byjove
Ruby
Posts: 16,189 Likes: 83,081
|
Post by byjove on May 1, 2019 7:45:07 GMT -6
|
|
angelashly
Unicorn
Posts: 70,144 Likes: 279,588
Member is Online
|
Post by angelashly on May 1, 2019 7:48:43 GMT -6
The fact that she hasn't had the baby yet makes me believe she told the public early due to her tour
|
|
byjove
Ruby
Posts: 16,189 Likes: 83,081
|
Post by byjove on May 1, 2019 7:55:36 GMT -6
I'm seeing buzz that the Queen's visit to Frogmore cottage means the baby has born, because the visit was not protocol. Idk, maybe not protocol, but if the Queen was visiting the new baby, wouldn't they announce (and I mean just announce, not necessarily details) that the baby had been born? I think maybe the Queen's visit was for moral support during the wait. We know the Queen likes her, and why the heck not?
|
|
Yogurt
Emerald
Posts: 11,938 Likes: 42,505
|
Post by Yogurt on May 1, 2019 7:56:35 GMT -6
I thought our babies were going to be the same age and now mine is 10 weeks old!
|
|
Yogurt
Emerald
Posts: 11,938 Likes: 42,505
|
Post by Yogurt on May 1, 2019 7:57:33 GMT -6
Me:
|
|
|
Post by notblanche on May 1, 2019 7:58:39 GMT -6
I'm seeing buzz that the Queen's visit to Frogmore cottage means the baby has born, because the visit was not protocol. Idk, maybe not protocol, but if the Queen was visiting the new baby, wouldn't they announce (and I mean just announce, not necessarily details) that the baby had been born? I think maybe the Queen's visit was for moral support during the wait. We know the Queen likes her, and why the heck not? When I heard the Queen went for a visit, I assumed the baby had been born.
|
|
Ls2012
Amethyst
Posts: 7,377 Likes: 32,705
|
Post by Ls2012 on May 1, 2019 8:01:47 GMT -6
Remember the nonsense about her wanting to wear the emerald tiara for her wedding but was told no?
It's May. May birthstone is emerald. In my ridiculous head, she held that baby in just so she could say she should get to wear the emerald tiara now. And her daughter (I'm convinced she's having a girl) should get it when she's older.
(Yes, yes. I know it doesn't work like that. But I could see myself at least trying that tactic...anything for a gorgeous emerald tiara. 😉)
|
|
|
Post by notblanche on May 1, 2019 8:08:37 GMT -6
When I heard the Queen went for a visit, I assumed the baby had been born. That story didn't actually say when the queen visited though -- I think it just said "recently." So it could have been a month ago, or however far back H&M moved into Frogmore. Clever journalism publishing the story now though, since everyone would think it was an actual baby update/hint. Hmmmm, good point
|
|
auburn
Sapphire
Posts: 3,558 Likes: 12,880
|
Post by auburn on May 1, 2019 8:08:56 GMT -6
I figured since Will and Kate went on Easter, and the Queen went too that the baby was born. It seems though that if that were the case they would have announced by now.
|
|
|
Post by notblanche on May 1, 2019 8:09:14 GMT -6
Remember the nonsense about her wanting to wear the emerald tiara for her wedding but was told no? It's May. May birthstone is emerald. In my ridiculous head, she held that baby in just so she could say she should get to wear the emerald tiara now. And her daughter (I'm convinced she's having a girl) should get it when she's older. (Yes, yes. I know it doesn't work like that. But I could see myself at least trying that tactic...anything for a gorgeous emerald tiara. 😉) I didn't particularly want a diamond birthstone baby either
|
|
|
Post by ilovelamp on May 1, 2019 8:12:03 GMT -6
I’m loving the title of the thread and the May gif is perf.
|
|
Nymeria
Sapphire
Posts: 3,863 Likes: 11,965
|
Post by Nymeria on May 1, 2019 8:19:26 GMT -6
|
|
angelashly
Unicorn
Posts: 70,144 Likes: 279,588
Member is Online
|
Post by angelashly on May 1, 2019 8:23:22 GMT -6
I'm seeing buzz that the Queen's visit to Frogmore cottage means the baby has born, because the visit was not protocol. Idk, maybe not protocol, but if the Queen was visiting the new baby, wouldn't they announce (and I mean just announce, not necessarily details) that the baby had been born? I think maybe the Queen's visit was for moral support during the wait. We know the Queen likes her, and why the heck not? When I heard the Queen went for a visit, I assumed the baby had been born. Same
|
|
|
Post by ArielMermaid on May 1, 2019 8:26:05 GMT -6
We’ve been told they will announce when she is in labor though? Right? Or am I making things up?
|
|
|
Post by mrsweasley on May 1, 2019 8:28:21 GMT -6
We’ve been told they will announce when she is in labor though? Right? Or am I making things up? I read that too
|
|
|
Post by notblanche on May 1, 2019 8:28:26 GMT -6
We’ve been told they will announce when she is in labor though? Right? Or am I making things up? Maybe they changed their minds
|
|
|
Post by mrsweasley on May 1, 2019 8:29:43 GMT -6
I read that the Queen visited Sunday, which would make sense as a "just saying hello" visit because she was nearby for the church service. I don't think it means she had the baby
|
|
|
Post by ArielMermaid on May 1, 2019 8:33:03 GMT -6
|
|
angelashly
Unicorn
Posts: 70,144 Likes: 279,588
Member is Online
|
Post by angelashly on May 1, 2019 8:34:47 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by mrsweasley on May 1, 2019 8:34:48 GMT -6
Also, I'm having all the sympathy for MM if she is overdue, although I read one report saying she may actually not be due until May 17th. DS2 was 12 days overdue and born in July instead of June (I'm *mad* about the birthstone 🙄) It was However if she's actually not due for 2-3 weeks 🤷♀️ Is the press pen set up near Frogmore yet?
|
|
angelashly
Unicorn
Posts: 70,144 Likes: 279,588
Member is Online
|
Post by angelashly on May 1, 2019 8:35:12 GMT -6
She definitely said late April early May though
|
|
|
Post by ArielMermaid on May 1, 2019 8:35:27 GMT -6
Sophie Countess of Wessex at the Padmanagar Apnalaya Health Clinic, Mumbai
|
|
emma
Ruby
Posts: 18,891 Likes: 86,723
Member is Online
|
Post by emma on May 1, 2019 8:37:36 GMT -6
I'm seeing buzz that the Queen's visit to Frogmore cottage means the baby has born, because the visit was not protocol. Idk, maybe not protocol, but if the Queen was visiting the new baby, wouldn't they announce (and I mean just announce, not necessarily details) that the baby had been born? I think maybe the Queen's visit was for moral support during the wait. We know the Queen likes her, and why the heck not? Also it’s her grandson and he moved a 10 minute walk through her garden. Maybe she just wanted to visit and see their renovations. Maybe she’s a fan of home improvements
|
|
|
Post by ArielMermaid on May 1, 2019 8:39:25 GMT -6
No press pen yet!
|
|
|
Post by mrsweasley on May 1, 2019 8:39:54 GMT -6
She definitely said late April early May though Well if they planned this trip for Harry she just jinxed herself into an overdue baby 😂 My parents decided to take my sister on a trip to visit a friend a week after my due date and nobody showed up to help with my bigger kids when DS2 was born. I have a lot of feels about it still, I can't decide what this means for MM's due date. She said late April/early May, but would Harry really want to leave her and a newborn, even for a night or two? Did she just think she would go early? Am I overthinking this?
|
|