jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:35:32 GMT -6
We dont care about 6E redactions.
We CARE about you spinning the report to exonerate the president.
LIGHTLY REDACTED?
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:35:41 GMT -6
Does anyone else feel like Barr is kind of all over the place? He's usually more eloquent than this
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:38:29 GMT -6
Let's get the clip of Graham saying, "Trump is a fucking idiot" and put it in a 30 second loop and run it on every cable news channel in primetime every day until the 2020 election
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:40:22 GMT -6
Does anyone else feel like Barr is kind of all over the place? He's usually more eloquent than this Yes
I'm having a harder than usual time following while working
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:42:39 GMT -6
confirmation on the popcorn thing
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:44:09 GMT -6
My letter wasnt intended to summarize?
WHAT THE WHAT?
Thats exactly what you did. Oh it was the PRESS... sure jan
So what was that press CONFERENCE all about? hmm
|
|
|
Post by oreobitsy on May 1, 2019 8:44:21 GMT -6
Seems like Barr is speaking for Mueller, maybe we should just hear it straight from Mueller.
|
|
misspatty
Global Moderator
Special Interests
Posts: 5,541 Likes: 44,712
|
Post by misspatty on May 1, 2019 8:44:50 GMT -6
You know I can’t resist a good hearing. 😘
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:45:25 GMT -6
Seems like Barr is speaking for Mueller, maybe we should just hear it straight from Mueller. This is gonna come back and bite Barr in the ass. Because Mueller IS eventually going to testify. Whether by choice or subpoena. (hes willing, DOJ is not)
|
|
athn64
Ruby
Posts: 17,414 Likes: 76,727
|
Post by athn64 on May 1, 2019 8:45:25 GMT -6
My letter wasnt intended to summarize? WHAT THE WHAT? Thats exactly what you did. Oh it was the PRESS... sure jan So what was that press CONFERENCE all about? hmm My summary wasn't a summay! Honest! I mean, wtf.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:47:26 GMT -6
Neal Katyal is NOT HAVING IT. He calls Barr's opening testimony "tragic."
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:48:43 GMT -6
Seems like Barr is speaking for Mueller, maybe we should just hear it straight from Mueller. This is gonna come back and bite Barr in the ass. Because Mueller IS eventually going to testify. Whether by choice or subpoena. (hes willing, DOJ is not) Prior to that letter becoming public I was refusing to pin my hopes on Mueller actually going out there and openly contradicting Barr but now.......
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:49:18 GMT -6
I hope they bring back Sally Yates to explain the underlying crime.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:49:41 GMT -6
waitwaitwaitwait, did Barr just say there DOESN'T have to be an underlying crime for Obstruction to happen? That directly contradicts what Graham said in his opening remarks.
(and that's also what a lot of brighter legal minds than Lindsey Graham have been saying for a month)
|
|
misspatty
Global Moderator
Special Interests
Posts: 5,541 Likes: 44,712
|
Post by misspatty on May 1, 2019 8:50:20 GMT -6
Barr looks like he's trying not to smile while answering this question about why he didn't bring obstruction charges and my blood pressure cannot handle it.
|
|
misspatty
Global Moderator
Special Interests
Posts: 5,541 Likes: 44,712
|
Post by misspatty on May 1, 2019 8:51:14 GMT -6
I hope they bring back Sally Yates to explain the underlying crime. Please yes. I have such a lady crush on Sally.
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:52:11 GMT -6
You trust him but dont trust the roadmap he laid out.
|
|
|
Post by cakewench on May 1, 2019 8:52:14 GMT -6
Let's get the clip of Graham saying, "Trump is a fucking idiot" and put it in a 30 second loop and run it on every cable news channel in primetime every day until the 2020 election Tweet for everything.
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:52:37 GMT -6
HOW can you do a through job when you can't face to face the subject of the investigation?
|
|
|
Post by cakewench on May 1, 2019 8:53:01 GMT -6
misspatty YAY! We missed you Hope all is well!
|
|
|
Post by oreobitsy on May 1, 2019 8:53:12 GMT -6
This is gonna come back and bite Barr in the ass. Because Mueller IS eventually going to testify. Whether by choice or subpoena. (hes willing, DOJ is not) Prior to that letter becoming public I was refusing to pin my hopes on Mueller actually going out there and openly contradicting Barr but now....... I would be seething if I were Mueller. Barr is just misrepresenting the findings.
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:54:44 GMT -6
In general yeah they constitute obstruction, but in this case, nah.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:55:36 GMT -6
Feinstein is challenging him on obstruction. How did POTUS trying to change McGahn's account not constitute obstruction?
Barr: mouthbreathing and words. "We felt that the government would not be able to establish obstruction."
So, AGAIN, this is not a case of "There was no obstruction," This is a case of "The prosecutor did not feel that he could prove obstruction beyond a reasonable doubt"
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:55:54 GMT -6
I hope Bob is in his office with his blinds closed and a do not disturb sign and making a case by case point list of this testimony
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:56:52 GMT -6
Because McGahn did not follow an order, its not obstruction
also it doesnt matter what the press reported. THATS WHAT HAPPENED
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:57:26 GMT -6
Barr is claiming that Trump didn't tell McGahn to fire Mueller, he just asked him to create a charge of Conflict of Interest and force him out. And he wasn't trying to change McGahn's testimony or account, he wanted McGahn to correct a NYT story that said he pushed Don to fire Mueller. I mean what.
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,742 Likes: 94,334
|
Post by jkjacq on May 1, 2019 8:58:07 GMT -6
Know what would have cleared this up? If Mueller had been allowed to DEPOSE THE PRESIDENT
|
|
roloma
Sapphire
Posts: 3,659 Likes: 21,893
|
Post by roloma on May 1, 2019 8:58:40 GMT -6
I see Barr has been taking word salad lessons from T. Feinstein is giving him "what the fuck are you saying?" looks.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:58:43 GMT -6
Axeing Mueller wasn't obstruction bc a different Special Counsel would have been appointed?
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh how'd you get your job buddy and what happened to the other Attorney GEneral?
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,667 Likes: 419,599
|
Post by dc2london on May 1, 2019 8:59:09 GMT -6
I need Barr to stop mouth breathing into the microphone.
|
|