|
Sessions
Jun 13, 2017 14:17:12 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by morecoffeeplease on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:12 GMT -6
Can the senate hold someone in contempt? Is that a thing?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:24 GMT -6
Oooh, King is good. He just caught Sessions already revealing a communication in the testimony and says he's been selective about the fake privilege thing.
|
|
|
Post by clairefraser on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:34 GMT -6
Does anyone understand WTF Sessions is trying to say here about why he can't answer the question?
|
|
cp3
Opal
Posts: 7,895 Likes: 34,435
|
Post by cp3 on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:44 GMT -6
Lol at King. So you just testified that Trump asked for your opinion on firing Comey but you can't discuss your communications with him?!
|
|
Lakes
Sapphire
Posts: 3,594 Likes: 13,281
|
Sessions
Jun 13, 2017 14:17:44 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Lakes on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:44 GMT -6
Wait. Did he just say he only knows what he reads in the paper but earlier he said he didn't read the news?
|
|
ktg
Moderator
Posts: 5,969 Likes: 33,153
|
Post by ktg on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:48 GMT -6
Can they do anything about his bullshit on this? Just refusing to answer questions because the president might not like it??
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 62,687 Likes: 429,528
|
Post by dc2london on Jun 13, 2017 14:17:59 GMT -6
christ on a bike. Of all days to have a bus break down in the parking lot.
|
|
kitchen
Gold
Posts: 928 Likes: 4,667
|
Post by kitchen on Jun 13, 2017 14:18:44 GMT -6
Does anyone understand WTF Sessions is trying to say here about why he can't answer the question? He is arguing that he can't talk at all about anything about which LDN could potentially invoke executive privilege.
|
|
kitchen
Gold
Posts: 928 Likes: 4,667
|
Post by kitchen on Jun 13, 2017 14:18:57 GMT -6
Does anyone understand WTF Sessions is trying to say here about why he can't answer the question? He is arguing that he can't talk at all about anything about which LDN could potentially invoke executive privilege. It's bullshit.
|
|
cp3
Opal
Posts: 7,895 Likes: 34,435
|
Post by cp3 on Jun 13, 2017 14:19:05 GMT -6
King definitely makes up for Collins.
|
|
|
Post by clairefraser on Jun 13, 2017 14:19:09 GMT -6
This is painful
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 62,687 Likes: 429,528
|
Post by dc2london on Jun 13, 2017 14:19:13 GMT -6
I"m stressed out by the woman behind Sessions bc she finished that whole cup of iced tea. She's going to have to pee way before this is over.
|
|
|
Post by shadesofgold on Jun 13, 2017 14:19:30 GMT -6
Best questions so far: Heinrich, King, Rubio.
|
|
cp3
Opal
Posts: 7,895 Likes: 34,435
|
Post by cp3 on Jun 13, 2017 14:19:51 GMT -6
Does anyone understand WTF Sessions is trying to say here about why he can't answer the question? He is arguing that he can't talk at all about anything about which LDN could potentially invoke executive privilege. Which King pointed out he is picking and choosing on which to invoke this made up privilege.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 62,687 Likes: 429,528
|
Post by dc2london on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:02 GMT -6
Lankford: You speak as a man eager to set the record straight.
Wut?
|
|
stringy
Opal
Posts: 8,307 Likes: 22,162
|
Post by stringy on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:18 GMT -6
Lankford: You speak as a man eager to set the record straight. Wut? he was clearly not paying attention
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 62,687 Likes: 429,528
|
Post by dc2london on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:31 GMT -6
Lankford, basically: BUT OBAMA
|
|
cp3
Opal
Posts: 7,895 Likes: 34,435
|
Post by cp3 on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:43 GMT -6
Lankford is kissing his ass.
|
|
|
Post by sheilathetank on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:44 GMT -6
Sessions has been blunt? Has lankford been watching the same thing I have been?
|
|
Minerva
Ruby
Posts: 15,383 Likes: 67,036
|
Post by Minerva on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:51 GMT -6
Lankford is an ass kisser, as per.
|
|
|
Post by clairefraser on Jun 13, 2017 14:20:52 GMT -6
So...what does this hearing give us? Someone is lying right? So...it's he said/he said. This is such a muddled mess.
And Lankford is just sucking his dick.
|
|
|
Post by charlotte on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:02 GMT -6
Get fucked, Lankford!
|
|
|
Post by sheilathetank on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:24 GMT -6
I"m stressed out by the woman behind Sessions bc she finished that whole cup of iced tea. She's going to have to pee way before this is over. omg. I've been watching that too. hahaha. Are they reporters?
|
|
|
Sessions
Jun 13, 2017 14:21:32 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by bunnyfungo on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:32 GMT -6
Wait? Did he just say Eric Holder would withhold information as a precedent. But then in the same sentence say that the courts compelled him to reveal the information anyway because he couldn't do that? Ummmm. You're making the wrong point.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 62,687 Likes: 429,528
|
Post by dc2london on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:44 GMT -6
oh god. Get fucked, Sooner.
|
|
ktg
Moderator
Posts: 5,969 Likes: 33,153
|
Post by ktg on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:48 GMT -6
Holder did it so it's ok.
... But the courts disagreed BUT ANYWAY there are private conversations.
Lankfort can suck eggs.
|
|
|
Post by charlotte on Jun 13, 2017 14:21:53 GMT -6
WHAT IS THE QUESTION, LANKFORD
|
|
pesto
Sapphire
Posts: 3,229 Likes: 19,529
|
Sessions
Jun 13, 2017 14:22:33 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by pesto on Jun 13, 2017 14:22:33 GMT -6
These republicans using their time to push an agenda and not ask any fucking questions are pissing me off. At least disguise your agenda with questions.
|
|
|
Sessions
Jun 13, 2017 14:23:00 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by bunnyfungo on Jun 13, 2017 14:23:00 GMT -6
Holder did it so it's ok. ... But the courts disagreed BUT ANYWAY there are private conversations. Lankfort can suck eggs. Oh good. Someone else caught that and I'm not taking crazy pills.
|
|
ktg
Moderator
Posts: 5,969 Likes: 33,153
|
Post by ktg on Jun 13, 2017 14:23:04 GMT -6
I'm glad Lankford prepared his monologue to eat up more time. Sessions needed a break.
|
|