elle
Ruby
Posts: 17,310 Likes: 111,556
Member is Online
|
Post by elle on Sept 18, 2021 15:45:11 GMT -6
Twitter is entertaining today.
|
|
|
Post by hawkeye2015 on Sept 18, 2021 16:12:24 GMT -6
Twitter is entertaining today. But does the Q shaman sing?
|
|
jkjacq
Ruby
Posts: 21,735 Likes: 94,319
|
Post by jkjacq on Sept 18, 2021 16:32:57 GMT -6
I saw a meme saying it’s amazing how many people get left out when social media platforms refuse to allow you to advertise or something close to that Also that some of the J6 people are prohibited from actually being in DC
|
|
elle
Ruby
Posts: 17,310 Likes: 111,556
Member is Online
|
Post by elle on Sept 18, 2021 20:42:19 GMT -6
Twitter is entertaining today. But does the Q shaman sing? Oh my. 😬
|
|
byjove
Ruby
Posts: 15,148 Likes: 73,890
|
Post by byjove on Sept 19, 2021 9:27:34 GMT -6
|
|
byjove
Ruby
Posts: 15,148 Likes: 73,890
|
Post by byjove on Sept 19, 2021 11:54:30 GMT -6
This is heinous.
|
|
addymac
Emerald
Posts: 12,665 Likes: 53,948
|
Post by addymac on Sept 19, 2021 12:05:48 GMT -6
Why can’t they go after him themselves?
|
|
|
Post by hawkeye2015 on Sept 19, 2021 12:24:31 GMT -6
|
|
jaygee
Diamond
Posts: 28,126 Likes: 218,634
|
Post by jaygee on Sept 19, 2021 12:28:38 GMT -6
I noped right out of Twitter this morning when that was the first thing I saw. No fucking thanks.
|
|
elle
Ruby
Posts: 17,310 Likes: 111,556
Member is Online
|
Post by elle on Sept 19, 2021 15:12:20 GMT -6
|
|
athn64
Ruby
Posts: 17,394 Likes: 76,621
|
Post by athn64 on Sept 19, 2021 15:28:35 GMT -6
Wow. The driver shortage is really making impacts on all sorts of things. I'm glad they were able to find some transport for the kids, but this shouldn't have been necessary.
|
|
|
Post by blurnette989 on Sept 19, 2021 15:44:51 GMT -6
Why can’t they go after him themselves? so if the government is the one enforcing the ban on abortion directly that is a clear constitutional violation. This la got around that by having individuais be the ones suing the abortion providers, so it keeps the government out of the loop. But by openly admitting before a citizen could accuse him of performing an abortion, he is *likely* trying to get the state to enforce an action against him so he can get it ruled unconstitutional for everybody. But also i never Considered the idea that doctors could just eat themselves put for performing abortions and then how does the state deal with it? Can ibdoviduals still bring claims at that point? Makes it much easier for the court to say that's nonsense, but hmmmmm.
|
|
byjove
Ruby
Posts: 15,148 Likes: 73,890
|
Post by byjove on Sept 19, 2021 19:18:24 GMT -6
Why can’t they go after him themselves? so if the government is the one enforcing the ban on abortion directly that is a clear constitutional violation. This la got around that by having individuais be the ones suing the abortion providers, so it keeps the government out of the loop. But by openly admitting before a citizen could accuse him of performing an abortion, he is *likely* trying to get the state to enforce an action against him so he can get it ruled unconstitutional for everybody. But also i never Considered the idea that doctors could just eat themselves put for performing abortions and then how does the state deal with it? Can ibdoviduals still bring claims at that point? Makes it much easier for the court to say that's nonsense, but hmmmmm. Yes, that’s the just of it.
|
|
dc2london
Admin
Press Secretary
Posts: 61,421 Likes: 418,125
|
Post by dc2london on Sept 20, 2021 5:16:02 GMT -6
so if the government is the one enforcing the ban on abortion directly that is a clear constitutional violation. This la got around that by having individuais be the ones suing the abortion providers, so it keeps the government out of the loop. But by openly admitting before a citizen could accuse him of performing an abortion, he is *likely* trying to get the state to enforce an action against him so he can get it ruled unconstitutional for everybody. But also i never Considered the idea that doctors could just eat themselves put for performing abortions and then how does the state deal with it? Can ibdoviduals still bring claims at that point? Makes it much easier for the court to say that's nonsense, but hmmmmm. Yes, that’s the just of it. That's my understanding too. I heard a few good podcasts on this issue that said, pretty much, this is the way to get this law challenged in court: someone would have to perform an abortion and tell on themselves, get sued, and fight it.
|
|